UGRSTM
Penis lengthening through modified ligamentolysis

Penis Lengthening Through Modified Ligamentolysis

For 30 years. Evidence-based. Performed personally by Prof. Alessandro Littara or Dr. med. univ. Roberto Melone.

How does surgical penis lengthening work – and what is really possible? Here you will find an honest, medical assessment: from the anatomical basis to the realistic result.

Jörg Hagen

Editorial Review: Jörg Hagen, Lead Physician

Updated on July 21, 2026

What Is Surgical Penis Lengthening?

Surgical penis lengthening is a procedure aimed at permanently increasing the visible portion of the penis. Contrary to a common misconception, nothing is artificially added in the process – the procedure makes existing length visible that is anatomically already present but not perceptible from the outside.

Penis lengthening is one of two components of surgical penis enlargement. It can be performed on its own or – in most cases more sensible – in combination with girth enhancement, to achieve a proportionate overall result.

Penis lengthening at UGRS Center Darmstadt is in the hands of Prof. Alessandro Littara andDr. med. univ. Roberto Melone – specialists with one of the highest levels of surgical experience in this field in Europe.

The UGRS medical team

Key Facts on Penis Lengthening

Before we go deeper into the subject of penis lengthening, we would like to give you an initial orientation:

Method

Relocation of the internal portion of the penis outward

Material

Exclusively the patient's own tissue

Lengthening

typical range approx. 3.8 – 8.1 cm permanent

Duration of surgery

approx. 45 minutes

Anaesthesia

twilight sleep + local anaesthesia

Hospital stay

outpatient

Sexual abstinence

5 weeks

Cost

approx. €9,500 alone / approx. €12,300 combined

It all starts with an honest question.

Felix Jung

Your personal patient advisor, Mr Felix Jung, is happy to answer your questions about the treatment and its process.

+49 6151 606 1034+49 152 275 552 37kontakt@ugrs.de

Monday to Friday

9:30 AM – 7:00 PM

or by individual arrangement

Show contents

The Anatomical Basis – Why It Is Possible to Lengthen the Penis

To understand why penis lengthening is possible at all, it helps to take a look at the anatomy of the penis.

The penis does not consist only of the visible external portion. A significant part lies inside the body – anchored by so-called suspensory ligaments (the ligamentum suspensorium penis and the ligamentum fundiforme penis) that attach the penis to the pubic bone. This internal portion is not visible from the outside, but it contributes to the overall length.

Through a targeted surgical adjustment of these ligament structures, the internal portion of the penis can be partially relocated outward. The result is a lengthening of the visible penile shaft – both in the flaccid and in the erect state. This is because we do not simply divide the ligaments, but create a new attachment to give the penis stability in its new position.

Important to understand: No length is created. Existing length is made visible.

The Surgical Method in Detail

Penis lengthening, as performed by the surgeons at UGRS Darmstadt, thus combines the adjustment of the ligament structures with a new attachment – a technique that uses exclusively the body's own tissue in place. Foreign materials, implants, or fillers are not used.

This approach is consistent with the current recommendations of the European Association of Urology (EAU), whose guidelines explicitly point out the risks of various foreign materials in penis-enlarging procedures.

Penis lengthening at UGRS is performed according to a scientifically grounded technique based on proven principles of male intimate surgery. The procedure is carried out equally by Prof. Alessandro Littara and Dr. med. univ. Roberto Melone, both of whom have extensive skill and many years of experience in this highly specialized methodology. At the centre of the procedure is always the same urological-reconstructive, medically therapeutic goal: to achieve a functional and at the same time harmonious lengthening, agreed upon with the patient, without impairing the natural structures and functional elements of the penis.

The male organ consists of a visible external portion and an internal portion that lies within the body. According to the widely cited description by our Lead Physician Jörg Hagen, this ratio is approximately 50:50 – an assessment that has been frequently picked up internationally, both in the press and on medical specialist websites. It is precisely this internal portion that our surgeons' technique addresses.

The so-called ligamentolysis is performed through a small, arc-shaped incision in the pubic hair area, deliberately designed to follow the natural course of a skin fold. The posterior ligaments, along which the nerves and vessels supplying the penis run, remain completely untouched. This approach – a core principle to which both Prof. Littara and Dr. med. univ. Melone are committed – is today regarded internationally as the consensus among experts in male intimate surgery, as it significantly reduces the risk to the patient.

The technique used, which has been published scientifically, makes use of an anatomical characteristic of the internal portion of the penis: it originally follows a slightly curved course. When this course is straightened, a geometric surplus is created, which produces the actual lengthening. This shifts the ratio of external to internal portion in favour of the visible area. As a result, penis length can on average be increased by 3.8 to 8.1 centimetres in this way, both in the flaccid and in the erect state. In individual cases, depending on the patient's specific anatomical conditions, results of over 8 centimetres are also possible.

Foreign materials such as silicone or implants are not used in this method. Prof. Littara and Dr. med. univ. Melone thus consistently follow the guidelines of the European Association of Urology (EAU), to which they are fully committed. Instead of foreign material, the body's own tissue is rotated in from the side and fixed using specially developed suturing techniques. The root of the penis, where the nerves, blood vessels, and urethra enter the penis, is spared in the process and remains unchanged. Because no incision is made into the penis itself, the risks associated with such an incision do not apply.

How pronounced the individual result turns out to be depends on several factors: the original angle of inclination, the length of the symphysis, but above all the structure and composition of the ligament tissue. This "quality" cannot be determined in advance through examination (neither technically nor by palpation), which is why the individual result cannot be predicted. These individual differences in connective tissue correspond to a principle known from other areas of medicine – comparable, for example, to the varying composition of intervertebral discs from patient to patient. This is precisely why the evidence-based approach of our two surgeons at UGRS Darmstadt is so important.

Procedure, Anaesthesia, and Aftercare

The procedure is performed on an outpatient basis and usually takes about 45 minutes. It uses a combination of local anaesthesia and state-of-the-art twilight sleep anaesthesia – with EEG monitoring, for an even more pleasant, relaxed experience. This is, of course, always administered by an experienced anaesthesiologist. General anaesthesia has not been necessary for this procedure at our practice for over 20 years. General anaesthesia would bring only disadvantages and no benefits for this procedure. The sutures used dissolve on their own, so no separate appointment for suture removal is needed. The patient can travel home, accompanied, on the same day. For predominantly office-based occupations, no time off is required; for physically demanding professions, we recommend a break of three to seven days.

Achievable Results – What Is Realistic?

Based on our clinical experience with several thousand procedures and our treatment concept, the following changes can be achieved in practice:

  • Lengthening: approx. 3.8 to 8.1 cm permanent
  • With our treatment concept, the result shows in both the flaccid and the erect state

When making your decision, however, please always consider whether a result at the lower end of this range would still achieve your desired outcome.

Individual Factors Influencing the Result

The figures given are intended as guide values and are explicitly not a guarantee of a particular result. How much lengthening can actually be achieved in an individual case depends on a range of factors that come into play during treatment.

A central role is played first of all by the individual anatomy in combination with the tissue elasticity of the ligament structures. The internal portion can be mobilised and straightened to varying degrees. The patient's general starting situation and body weight also factor into the achievable result, as both can influence the anatomical conditions and the visibility of the result. Last but not least, where necessary, consistent aftercare helps to secure the result achieved in the long term.

In addition to these individual factors, the surgeon's experience is equally central to the reliability of the result. In this context, Prof. Alessandro Littara is the only physician named by name in the current guidelines of the European Association of Urology (EAU) on the subject of surgical penis enlargement. This mention is more than a formal footnote – it underscores the scientific standing his work enjoys internationally in this field, and reflects the many years of clinical and scientific engagement underlying his methodology.

What Realistic Expectation Management Means

After the procedure, many patients report not only greater functional size, but also a changed sense of their own body, greater self-confidence, and an improved way of dealing with intimacy. Some find that the external change does not automatically resolve inner insecurities – that takes time.

That is precisely why an honest consultation always includes the question: what do you expect – and can this be achieved surgically?

Who Is Penis Lengthening Suitable For?

The decision to undergo penis lengthening is always a very personal one, and it should be carefully considered. From our experience, such a procedure can make sense when several conditions are met together. This first includes a persistent sense of discomfort – that is, a real, objectifiable level of distress. Not a passing doubt, but a feeling that persists over a longer period and noticeably affects quality of life. It is equally important that the individual starting situation makes this procedure appear medically and anatomically sensible. Not every starting situation can be resolved through this operation, and it is precisely this assessment that we make together with you as part of the detailed initial consultation.

Realistic expectations of a surgical procedure are also of central importance. Penis lengthening follows the anatomical possibilities of the individual body. When a patient's expectations align with what is medically achievable, this is an essential foundation for a satisfactory result and for your satisfaction after the procedure. Finally, general health must also permit an outpatient procedure, so that the operation can be performed safely and with low risk.

When We Advise Against Penis Lengthening

Just as important as the question of when a procedure makes sense is, for us, the question of when we deliberately advise against it. Not every situation can be treated surgically with this procedure, and for us this openness is inseparable from responsible consultation.

We advise against penis lengthening when expectations, which can sometimes arise from intense and long-standing distress, exceed the medically achievable results. A procedure that cannot from the outset fulfil what a patient hopes for rarely leads to genuine satisfaction – even if it is technically performed flawlessly. We likewise advise against it when the psychological distress is complex and an operation is not the right or the only answer to that distress. In such cases, it is our task to address this openly. The same applies when a patient's state of health does not permit a procedure, for example due to pre-existing conditions or unsuccessful prior surgeries.

In patients whose individual starting situation offers no medical reason for an operation, we deliberately advise against a procedure.

This openness is a fixed part of how we understand treatment. We do not see our task as fulfilling every wish for a surgical procedure, but rather as honestly working out together with you whether penis lengthening is the right therapeutic path for your personal situation. An initial, no-obligation conversation helps to carefully assess your starting situation, your expectations, and the medical possibilities.

Combination with Girth Enhancement

In most cases, penis lengthening is combined with girth enhancement. The reason is not only the more pronounced change, but above all the natural realities in how an organ is shaped.

An isolated lengthening without an adjustment of girth often cannot fully solve the problem and can lead to an unbalanced result that did not exist beforehand. The combination makes it possible to control the overall picture more precisely and to achieve a natural, therapeutically coherent appearance.

You can find out more about the girth enhancement method on the corresponding page.

What Does Penis Lengthening Cost?

As a guide:

  • penis lengthening alone: approx. €9,500
  • combination of lengthening + girth enhancement (recommended): approx. €12,300

The price includes the medical consultation, the surgical procedure, anaesthesia, use of the operating facilities, and medical aftercare. Please feel free to contact us regarding payment options and further details.

Frequently Asked Questions About Penis Lengthening

Yes. The length gained through the relocation of the internal portion of the penis is permanent. It does not depend on hormones, weight, or other factors that change over time.

No. Surgical penis lengthening does not interfere with the mechanisms of erection. Nerve pathways and blood supply are not affected by the procedure, provided it is performed correctly.

With proper healing, the scar above the penis is not visible. We use an intracutaneous suturing technique (an aesthetic suture method).

The procedure is possible from the completed age of 18, once physical growth is finished. Individual maturity and the starting situation are discussed during the consultation.

The result fully stabilises after several months. In the first few weeks, swelling can still affect the appearance. Patience during the healing phase is an essential part of the treatment's success.

Our Experience, Your Advantage

30 Years – A Track Record That Proves It

Surgical penis lengthening was long a subject hardly anyone spoke about publicly – neither patients nor doctors. Since the early 1990s, UGRS physicians have helped bring this procedure out of the grey zone and into evidence-based medicine: through consistent quality, scientific publications, and the courage to take seriously a field others avoided.

This did not go unnoticed. In 2014, the British Guardian called Germany the world champion of penis enlargement – with direct reference to the work of our physicians. Prof. Alessandro Littara remains to this day the only physician named by name in the EAU guidelines in this field[36].

What this means for you: when you come to us, you are not speaking with someone who has offered this procedure for a few years. You are speaking with the team that helped shape this field.

  • Performing surgical penis lengthening since 1993
  • Exclusive use of the patient's own tissue – no foreign implants[1][6]
  • Guideline-compliant approach following EAU recommendations[36]
  • Structured aftercare as a fixed part of the treatment concept
  • Discreet consultation, confidential atmosphere

You don't have to figure this out alone.

The decision for surgical penis enlargement is always a personal one. Our goal is not to convince you to have a procedure – but to give you an honest basis on which you can decide for yourself.

Many of our patients didn't dare bring up this topic for years. The first step isn't a procedure – it's a conversation.

Write to us, call us, or book an appointment online for an initial conversation.

The first step isn't a procedure – it's a conversation.

Point of contact

Over 3,000 men a year confidentially reach out to us with their questions. We listen and give answers. Discreetly and with no obligation.

+49 6151 606 1034+49 152 275 552 37kontakt@ugrs.de

Monday to Friday

9:30 AM – 7:00 PM

or by individual arrangement

Or send us your question. If you'd like a callback, feel free to add your phone number and a time when you can be reached.

Sources & References

  1. 1. Littara A, Melone R, Morales-Medina JC, Iannitti T, Palmieri B. (2019) Cosmetic penile enhancement surgery: a 3-year single-centre retrospective clinical evaluation of 355 cases. Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 19;9(1):6323.
    DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-41652-w PubMed: 31004096
  2. 2. American Board of Urology (2024) Residency Requirements and Training Standards.
    Link: ABU Residency Requirements
  3. 3. McDougall EM, Watters TJ, Clayman RV. (2007) 4-year curriculum for urology residency training. J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2540-4.
    DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.035 PubMed: 17937938
  4. 4. Trost L, Watter DN, Carrier S, Khera M, Yafi FA, Bernie HL, Ziegelmann M, Köhler T. (2024) Cosmetic penile enhancement procedures: an SMSNA position statement. J Sex Med. 2024 May 28;21(6):573-578.
    DOI: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdae045 PubMed: 38654638
  5. 5. Carrier S, Zajac JD, Punjani N. (2008) Sexual dysfunction in men: advances in therapy and diagnosis. CMAJ. 2008 Sep 9;179(6):587-92.
    DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.080346 PubMed: 18760874
  6. 6. Falagario UG, Piramide F, Pang KH, Durukan E, Tzelves L, Ricapito A, Baekelandt L, Checcucci E, Carrion DM, Bettocchi C, Esperto F. (2024) Techniques for Penile Augmentation Surgery: A Systematic Review of Surgical Outcomes, Complications, and Quality of Life. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 May 2;60(5):758.
    DOI: 10.3390/medicina60050758 PubMed: 38792941
  7. 7. Xing MH, Hou SW, Raheem OA. (2022) Aesthetic Penile Augmentation Procedures: A Comprehensive and Current Perspective. Curr Urol Rep. 2022 Dec;23(12):355-361.
    DOI: 10.1007/s11934-022-01123-8 PubMed: 36350528
  8. 8. Colombo F, Casarico A. (2008) Penile enlargement. Curr Opin Urol. 2008 Nov;18(6):583-8.
    DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32830fe427 PubMed: 18832943
  9. 9. Manfredi C, Romero Otero J, Djinovic R. (2022) Penile girth enhancement procedures for aesthetic purposes. Int J Impot Res. 2022 May;34(4):337-342.
    DOI: 10.1038/s41443-021-00459-y PubMed: 34257403
  10. 10. Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL. (2003) Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003 Nov 27;349(22):2117-27.
    DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa035205 PubMed: 14645640
  11. 11. Chowdhury MM, Dagash H, Pierro A. (2007) A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome. Br J Surg. 2007 Feb;94(2):145-61.
    DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5714 PubMed: 17256810
  12. 12. Mitchell P, Gottschalk M, Butts G, Xerogeanes J. (2013) Surgical site infection: A comparison of multispecialty and single specialty outpatient facilities. J Orthop. 2013 Sep 5;10(3):111-4.
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2013.07.005 PubMed: 24396225
  13. 13. Pang G, Kwong M, Schlachta CM, Alkhamesi NA, Hawel JD, Elnahas AI. (2021) Safety of Same-day Discharge in High-risk Patients Undergoing Ambulatory General Surgery. J Surg Res. 2021 Jul;263:71-77.
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.01.024 PubMed: 33639372
  14. 14. Su X, Zhao Z, Zhang W, Tian Y, Wang X, Yuan X, Tian S. (2024) Sedation versus general anesthesia on all-cause mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Apr 2;24(1):126.
    DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02505-w PubMed: 38565990
  15. 15. Fedok FG, Ferraro RE, Kingsley CP, Fornadley JA. (2000) Operative times, postanesthesia recovery times, and complications during sinonasal surgery using general anesthesia and local anesthesia with sedation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Apr;122(4):560-6.
    DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2000.10049 PubMed: 10740178
  16. 16. Deskoulidi PI, Caminer D. (2023) Lengthening Phalloplasty with Division of the Suspensory Ligament and Distally Based Fat Flaps in Penis Enlargement Operations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Sep 1;152(3):434e-437e.
    DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010313 PubMed: 36943707
  17. 17. Elist JJ, Valenzuela R, Hillelsohn J, Feng T, Hosseini A. (2018) A Single-Surgeon Retrospective and Preliminary Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the Penuma Silicone Sleeve Implant for Elective Cosmetic Correction of the Flaccid Penis. J Sex Med. 2018 Sep;15(9):1216-1223.
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.07.006 PubMed: 30145095
  18. 18. Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT. (2008) Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol. 2008 Apr;20(2):86-100.
    DOI: 10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004 PubMed: 18162407
  19. 19. Arciola CR, Campoccia D, Ehrlich GD, Montanaro L. (2015) Biofilm-based implant infections in orthopaedics. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015;830:29-46.
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-11038-7_2 PubMed: 25366219
  20. 20. Juwono T, Buscaino K, Fernandez-Crespo R, Carrion R. (2021) Infection of the Penuma penile implant and associated post-operative complications: A case report. Urol Case Rep. 2021 Sep 9;39:101846.
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eucr.2021.101846 PubMed: 34567976
  21. 21. Siegal AR, Celtik KE, Razdan S, Sljivich M, Kansas B, Shah B, Levine LA, Valenzuela RJ. (2024) A multi-institutional update on surgical outcomes after penile silicone sleeve implantation. Ther Adv Urol. 2024 Apr 2;16:17562872241241858.
    DOI: 10.1177/17562872241241858 PubMed: 38571490
  22. 22. García Callejo FJ, Calvo González J, Agustí Martínez J, Bécares Martínez C, Monzó Gandía R, Marco Algarra J. (2013) Neck lymphadenitis due to silicone granuloma after mammary implants. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2013 May-Jun;64(3):217-22. [English, Spanish]
    DOI: 10.1016/j.otorri.2012.12.003 PubMed: 23499209
  23. 23. Europäische Kondomnorm EN ISO 4074 – Offizielle Links
    Link: DIN Media (Offizieller Verkauf)
  24. 24. DIN EN ISO 4074:2024-09 – Norm-Entwurf für die nächste Version
    Link: DIN Media (Entwurf)
  25. 25. Di Mauro M, Tonioni C, Cocci A, Kluth LA, Russo GI, Gomez Rivas J, Cacciamani G, Cito G, Morelli G, Polloni G, di Maida F, Giunti D; Trauma, Reconstructive Urology, Men’s Health Working Parties of the European Association of Urology (EAU) Young Academic Urologists (YAU). (2021) Penile length and circumference dimensions: A large study in young Italian men. Andrologia. 2021 Jul;53(6):e14053.
    DOI: 10.1111/and.14053 PubMed: 33748967
  26. 26. Belladelli F, Del Giudice F, Glover F, Mulloy E, Muncey W, Basran S, Fallara G, Pozzi E, Montorsi F, Salonia A, Eisenberg ML. (2023) Worldwide Temporal Trends in Penile Length: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World J Mens Health. 2023 Oct;41(4):848-860.
    DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.220203 PubMed: 36792094
  27. 27. Habous M, Muir G, Tealab A, Williamson B, Elkhouly M, Elhadek W, Mahmoud S, Laban O, Binsaleh S, Abdelwahab O, Mulhall JP, Veale D. (2015) Analysis of the Interobserver Variability in Penile Length Assessment. J Sex Med. 2015 Oct;12(10):2031-2035.
    DOI: 10.1111/jsm.13005 PubMed: 26440678
  28. 28. Promodu K, Shanmughadas KV, Bhat S, Nair KR. (2007) Penile length and circumference: an Indian study. Int J Impot Res. 2007 Nov-Dec;19(6):558-563.
    DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901569 PubMed: 17568760
  29. 29. Mostafaei H, Mori K, Katayama S, Quhal F, Pradere B, Yanagisawa T, Laukhtina E, König F, Motlagh RS, Rajwa P, Salehi-Pourmehr H, Hajebrahimi S, Shariat SF. (2025) A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Penis Length and Circumference According to WHO Regions: Who has the Biggest One? Urol Res Pract. 2025 Mar 7;50(5):291-301.
    DOI: 10.5152/tud.2025.24038 PubMed: 40248849
  30. 30. Wang C, WangDing Y. (2025) A meta-analysis of Chinese men’s penile size in a global context. Andrology. 2025 May;13(4):681-693.
    DOI: 10.1111/andr.13727 PubMed: 39087754
  31. 31. Lever, J., Frederick, D. A., & Peplau, L. A. (2006) Does Size Matter? Men’s and Women’s Views on Penis Size Across the Lifespan. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 7(3), 129–143
    Link: Volltext-PDF (UCLA)
  32. 32. Dixson, A. F. (2009) Sexual Selection and the Origins of Human Mating Systems. Oxford University Press.
    DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780199559428.001.0001
  33. 33. Gallup GG Jr, Burch RL. (2004) Semen displacement as a sperm competition strategy in humans. Evolutionary Psychology. 2004;2(1):12–23.
    DOI: 10.1177/147470490400200105
  34. 34. Barnhart KT, Izquierdo A, Pretorius ES, Shera DM, Shabbout M, Shaunik A. (2006) Baseline dimensions of the human vagina. Hum Reprod. 2006 Jun;21(6):1618-1622.
    DOI: 10.1093/humrep/del022 PubMed: 16478763
  35. 35. Pendergrass PB, Belovicz MW, Reeves CA. (2003) Surface area of the human vagina as measured from vinyl polysiloxane casts. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2003;55(2):110-113.
    DOI: 10.1159/000070184 PubMed: 12771458
  36. 36. EAU Guidelines Sexual and Reproductive Health / 9. Penile Size Abnormalities And Dysmorphophobia
    Link: uroweb.org

Author

Jörg Hagen

Jörg Hagen

UGRS Management

Doctor Profile

Medically Reviewed By

Prof. Alessandro Littara

Prof. Alessandro Littara

Specialist in Surgical Penis Enlargement

Doctor Profile
Dr. med. univ. Roberto Melone

Dr. med. univ. Roberto Melone

Plastic Surgery

Doctor Profile